Alright folks! The polls have been tallied! The results are in! We have a date, time, and location for our tweetup! Hurray!!
Date with 50% of the votes: August 17th at 7pm
Location with 40% of the votes: Boston Beer Works at the Fenway (61 Brookline Ave, phone number 617-536-2337)
The good news is that the winning date there is no Red Sox game at all. We’re talking they aren’t even playing an away game. This should significantly free up Boston Beer Works.
Please please please RSVP either here in comments or by DMing me on Twitter. This way if it’s a sizable group coming, I can give the folks at Boston Beer Works a heads-up. Plus we’ll know if everyone has arrived or not on the night of the tweetup. 😉 Also feel free to @, DM, or comment suggestions/queries/concerns. Looking forward to meeting folks in person!
Upon garnering suggestions from both here and Twitter, I have assembled the following polls. I’m eliminating the “other” option, because Poll-daddy didn’t do a very good job of keeping track of those on my end last time. Everybody seems to like the idea of a relaxed pub/restaurant venue and a 7pm time-slot, so all dates are accompanied by a 7pm time. All pubs/restaurants are accompanied by a general Boston location indicator for those who might not know. Poll will close at 4:00pm tomorrow, aka Thursday.
Note: It’s “Porter Belly’s Pub,” but for some reason Poll-daddy doesn’t think “porter” is a real word……
I was quite excited to be the recipient of my first ARC (Advanced Reading Copy). I hadn’t realized when I put myself on the list that The Carousel Painter was published by Bethany House, a Christian publishing group. I actually read a lot of Bethany House books when I was growing up, so I am quite familiar with the genre, but since deconverting from Christianity at 20, let’s just say, Christian fiction isn’t my first reading choice. However, I’d made a promise to the publisher, so I decided to give it a fair shot. Not to mention, this would be a great exercise in being a fair critic.
After her father dies, leaving her without family, Carrington Brouwer moves from France to Ohio to stay with her friend Augusta Galloway while looking for work in the late 1800s. Augusta’s father owns a carousel factory, and Carrie sees an opportunity to put her painting skills to good use. At the pressure of the women of the family, Mr. Galloway hires her, even though she will be the only woman working in the factory. Carrie must deal with the prejudices and fears of the men and their wives, as well as of the community, while addressing her own problems with pride and God. She also must deal with Augusta’s suitor, Tyson, who makes inappropriate moves on her and attempts to pin the theft of Mrs. Galloway’s jewels on her.
Miller possesses writing talent on the sentence level, for sure. The sentences flow well, and the dialogue is relatively believable. She shows forward-thinking for her genre by giving Carrie an independent spirit and not condemning it. At first I was excited that she seemed to be offering a relatively unique storyline to her genre.
However, the addition about half-way through of the plot-line of Carrie being a suspect in the theft of Mrs. Galloway’s jewels is a widely used one. The good Christian must suffer and have faith her innocence will be proven in the end. It was incredibly predictable. Plus it simply felt out of place and jarring given the beginning of the story.
I was also bothered by Carrie’s quirk of giggling when she’s nervous or upset. It’s such a misogynistic stereotype–the giggling female, and it simply did not fit with the rest of Carrie’s character.
I did appreciate, and I think fans of the genre will too, that Carrie’s faith and God were not the focus of nearly every single the page. Carrie growing in faith is part of her life and is addressed as such, but it is not the focus of the story. It’s simply a fact about her that comes up periodically. I know when I was into Christian lit as a teen, I would often wish they’d just tell me the story for once instead of preaching all the time. Yet I also know that fans of Christian lit will expect at least a little bit about God in the story. I think Miller struck this balance well.
Overall, it’s a step in the right direction for the genre, but Miller could have done a much better job writing a believable, unpredictable storyline while pushing the envelope against misogyny.
2.5 out of 5 stars
Source: ARC from publisher via LibraryThing‘s Early Reviewers program.
Hi fellow Massachusetts twitter librarians! The results from the first polls are in! *drum-roll*
Winning by a strong margin with 12 votes: Boston!
Runners-up: 4 votes–Worcester, 2 votes–Northampton, 1 vote–Haverhill
Winning by a very narrow margin with 5 votes: August 16-29 Weekday!
Runners-up: 4 votes–September 13-30 Weekday, 4 votes–September 16-29 Weekend
I think deciding on a tweetup location would be of great help in choosing an exact date. Suggestions so far have included a bar, a coffeeshop, NELINET’s site, somewhere at Simmons GSLIS, etc… Please comment on this post with suggestions, either general type or venue or someplace specific. If there’s an obvious concensus among the comments, then we won’t run another poll, but if there isn’t, we will. Suggestions always welcome!
I volunteered to provide a poll for both location and date of a Massachusetts librarian tweet-up. Please only vote once! I’ve done my best to pick relatively large-ish cities, but feel free to select “other” and write-in something if I’m missing something. As far as date goes, I’m asking for generalized time-frames with an exact date to be determined later. Be looking for a follow-up post with results!
Last week, a patron walked through our library door and excitedly exclaimed to us, “I haven’t been here in forever! I’ve been living electronically.” He went on to explain to us that he’s been conducting most of his research in his office via our library website.
In my graduate classes, we often talk about the library as place. By this the professors mean establishing the library building as a place the community thinks about. “Let’s go to the library” should be as natural a thought for a group of friends as “Let’s go to Starbucks.” Yet a library doesn’t only possess a physical space, they also possess a virtual space patrons frequent. Often far less, if any, thought is given to branding the library’s virtual space.
Most libraries have some sort of home page in addition to the online catalog (OPAC). Many also have a few pages directed toward certain patrons, such as a teen page in public libraries or research help for the humanities for academic libraries. The more cutting-edge libraries might also have a blog and a link to a twitter account. In my exxperience, there is no cohesiveness among these pages. There is no clear brand that this is Noname Library’s virtual space beyond perhaps a bar across the top of the page with the library’s name on it. Although I know a lot of effort is usually put into designing these pages, they often seem haphazardly thrown together. There is no cohesiveness. Worse, especially for a public used to the cutting-edge of technology, many libraries are using old, out-dated, and even proven inadequate website design theories. It’s like the designer has paid zero atttention to the research conducted in the last decade showing what works best for making a website browsable.
Thus, while Noname Library may have the most up-to-date chairs and the best seating arrangements at the actual library, their website screams the 90s, and most likely turns off at least a few users from coming back.
Libraries should think about themselves the way social networking businesses do when it comes to their presence online. There should be a symbol that automatically makes the user think of the brand, like Twitter’s bird. Although pages may look different from each other, they still should be recognizable as belonging to the same website. There should be space on the library’s website for patrons to socialize with each other, even if it was something as simple as a blog members of the book club were given guest accounts for so they could blog about the current read. Finally, and probably most importantly, the library website should consistently be assessed for browsability. Outdated web design ideas should be cleared out from the website, leaving clear, modern space.
While the library as physical place is important, the fact of the matter is, most of our patrons do not solely live their lives in the physical space. They also have virtual lives, and libraries should be a go-to place in that area of patron’s lives too.
The Unlikely Disciple: A Sinner’s Semester at America’s Holiest University chronicles Kevin Roose’s “take it to the streets” approach to the conservative/liberal culture divide in America. At the time a student at Brown, Roose decided to spend his semester abroad at infamous Liberty University, one of the best-known Christian fundamentalist colleges in the United States. He wanted an insider’s view, so for that semester he presented himself as a recent Sinner’s Prayer convert, and sought to blend in with Liberty students, doing what they would do.
You would expect a book like this to come from an Anthropology major, but Roose is actually a Journalism major, and it quite honestly shows. Roose seeks to honestly present his experiences, peppered with periodic facts about the Bible, Christianity, and the history of Liberty. While I didn’t need these explanations, I’m sure many readers would, so they are useful. However, Roose repeatedly fails to truly analyze in any sort of a detached manner the fundamentalist community. This causes the book to fall short of being academic and reading much more like a short memoir.
While Roose’s writing is surprisingly quite good, his experiment has a few fundamental flaws. I get it that Roose had to seek to blend in in order to get an insider’s view of the fundamentalist community. However, he repeatedly fails to encounter the very real experience of not fitting in among fundamentalists. Kids who are raised in the community didn’t choose to embrace this way of living the way Roose did. They are born into it; it’s drilled into their heads their whole lifetime; and they often must face the very real possibility that if they leave it they lose their families. Roose wasn’t raised believing in hell as a a real place. He never spent nights up worrying and crying over good family members who just aren’t “saved.” It truly frustrated me when I saw three possibilities in the book for him to have investigated what it’s like for people raised in the faith.
First, he goes to a meeting of a support group for men struggling with homosexual tendencies, but he went once and he didn’t then seek out anybody from this group to talk to him about what it’s like to be gay and a fundamentalist. What was he thinking? This was the perfect opportunity!
Second, Roose dates a girl, Anna, who states to him that she’s a more liberal Christian than Liberty would want. He never extensively talks with her what it’s like for women in fundamentalism. In fact, he never really seeks out the women at Liberty much at all. He goes on a few dates to help maintain his facade, but he doesn’t seem to have truly sought to befriend the women at all.
Third, he overhears some of his friends discussing how much it pains them to think of good unsaved people going to hell and worse saved people going to heaven. This is a classic issue for people raised in fundamentalist Christianity, and Roose simply comments on it in about one paragraph. You would think he would have sought to address the very real psychological pain contained in that conversation he overheard, yet he didn’t.
What bothered me most about Roose’s experience is he comes away saying that fundamentalist Christianity isn’t all that bad. The people in it are by-and-large nice folk, and we shouldn’t let a little political disagreement interfere with more cross-cultural understanding. Well, that’s easy enough for a straight, white male to say. Of course he found it mostly tolerable! His two greatest struggles were no sex for a semester and trying not to swear. He isn’t a person who believes hell is a real place struggling to combat his homosexuality. He isn’t a woman being repeatedly told she must submit to her husband and that it is unbiblical for her to teach men. I know that Roose can’t help it that he isn’t any of those people, yet he could have sought to tell their stories too. The fundamentalist kids at Liberty were nice to him because they thought he belonged, and after that because they knew about the book and wanted to look good.
In the end, The Unlikely Disciple grants the reader a view of what it’s like to be fundamentalist if you fit right in and believe it. It fails to bring up the very real dangers for people raised in the faith who don’t just naturally fit right in.
I’m concerned that it will make fundamentalist Christianity look far too safe to those who don’t encounter it much in their day to day life. Although the writing is good, this concern leads me to give it:
3 out of 5 stars